Exercise - Exertion - Excitement

(Exhaustion by any other name)

The ritual of exercise as practiced and promoted in North America today is yet another drug being pushed to the unsuspecting consumer masses—particularly women. The very word itself is indicative of how feeble our instincts for right and wrong have become. It derives from the Latin word exercere and translates to mean ... ex— “out of”, and arcere— “to restrain.”
So loosely translated, the word exercise literally means “out of restraint”, (or better yet) “out of control!”
Comparisons between the social activities of ancient eastern cultures and today’s Europeanized societies by ethno-biologists have observed that one would never have witnessed these societies (or even the so-called “wild animals” of Nature) exert and waste precious life energies in their own natural environments, the way the hyper-active over-stimulated peoples of western civilization do today.
This is because the ancient ones (as well as the animals) were instinctively cognizant of the toxic nature of such hyper-activity, especially when done in relationship to environmental elements such as oxygen! If such activities are now being practiced by so-called third world “developing” countries, it is merely a clearer indication that McDonald's, Wendy's, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Starbucks, and Burger King has had a perverse impact on the biology and psychologies of the last 5 generations of these people, because refined, de-natured foods have become dietary staples in their misguided lives.
The elder societies of our planet, for the most part, were infinitely wiser than we are concerning exercise and well being, and their cultural activities once reflected this. In ancient Oriental philosophy for example, exercise by the average man and woman was done through isometric techniques (like Tai Chi) to prevent a disruption of the body's delicate internal equilibrium, especially for females. You see a body already in perfect harmony with itself and operating in perfect homeostasis with its environment, would never seek to destabilize itself with strenuous exercising. Only a toxic, agitated, enervated body that does not feel balanced, would seek “balance” through the performance of stressful exercise!
Furthermore, because a body becomes accustomed to something doesn’t mean it likes what has been forced upon it. In the case of exercise, it is merely reacting in self-defense to a life-accelerated life draining activity the same way it would if it were subjected to the constant abuse of drugs or alcohol—it accommodates it!
All strenuous exercise creates a symptom called ’oxygen debt’, which causes an enormous build up of lactic acid that accumulates in the muscles and the liver. Lactic acid kills cells. It's the substance that causes the muscle stiffness, aches and pains to occur just after stressful activity.

Strenuous exercise also results in the auto-oxidation of epinephrine and norepinephrine, which in turn results in the appearance of free-radicals and lipid (fat) peroxidation. Cells must have a balance of oxygen, and herein lay the key to health. When exercise causes the rise of adrenalin there is the loss of pH control and acidosis overtakes the body. Again, high lactic acid levels impede efficient oxygen distribution, and cells die as a result.

Thus running 5 to 10 miles daily as a form of exercise is injurious to the body, especially when done by women in the toxic soup of a modern-day polluted and paved city environment. Unless you intend to run a marathon, it is a chronic waste of your precious life force and of the greatest detriment to a woman’s reproductive organs. Each time she plants her foot a static electrical “impact shock” is registered in the calcanus or heel bone, which is conducted by the tibia and the fibula on to the patella (knee cap), then amplified by the femur to finally impact the sacrum that frames and houses the precious womb.
I've seen runners jogging through the traffic of mid‑town Manhattan on a humid mid‑summer's day, and often wondered if I'm the only one left with a functioning brain cell for taking notice of the insanity in this.
With literally tons of noxious carbon monoxide, lead arsenics, sulfides and ammonium oxides permeating the air, why would anyone in their right mind even want to walk through this gook, much less run through it. Isn’t logical to assume that by running in such an environment they are sucking soot into their lungs at 2 to 3x the rate, and thus at twice the average doses?

Studies were also conducted where high levels of vitamin and mineral supplements were given to one group of athletes, and none to a placebo group. At the end, the blood nutrient levels of both experimental groups were checked and it was found that neither one had risen. In fact they had both dropped substantially in essential nutrient content. The test showed that exercise depletes vital essences and that athletes lose significant amounts of the essential nutrients and supplements they take in (even in higher than normal doses), proving that the ritual of exercise is not natural to Man.
But you would never know this the way the sports industry promotes their “just do it” commercials to you, and the way celebrity jocks who are addicted by the rituals of sport (making obscene dollars promoting sneakers and other paraphernalia) defend it as a “healthy” way of life.
In moderation, yes it is. But where in western society would you find people who ever pursued destructive activities ‘in moderation?’
Case in point: a perfect example of the sports industry taking advantage of the public's gullibility and ignorance of the true workings of a healthy body was seen in an advertisement for Nike F.I.T athletic apparel. It was a quintessential example of the Orwellian doublethink/doublespeak methodologies that go into making up today's subliminally enhanced, mind-manipulating advertisements.
This particular ad appeared in Essence magazine (July 1997) and covered two pages. One side (the title page) said in bold print “... Sweat is your body leaking fuel.” How true.
The other page shows a female jogger running with the Nike emblem on her chest—sweat, strain and dogged determination registered on her face. The real assault on the reader's intelligence is actually seen in the smaller, more obscure caption printed at the very bottom of the title page, which read:

“…The only way to stop sweating is to stop running. Since there's no way in hell that's going to happen, you'd better find a way to deal with the tide of nutrients running down your back..."

This sentence is a contradiction to common sense; it flat-out tells you what you are doing is wrong, then subtly tells you not to stop doing it! This caption should be enough to alert the reader that profuse sweating from strenuous exercise is perilous to the body because it results in a drastic depletion of vital nutrients necessary to its health and well-being. Instead, you are casually told that even though you are seriously injuring yourself by this activity

“you'd better find a way to deal with the tide of nutrients running down your back.” Of course, in the very next sentence they tell how to deal with it:

"... which is why we invented Dri-F.I.T, part of a larger Nike F.I.T line of athletic apparel. Dri F.I.T. pulls moisture away from your skin so your clothes dry quicker. So, even though your body continues to leak, you're not wearing a soggy reminder on your back..."

Whaaat?!!
My Sisters; brothers; anyone out there! Is this getting through? Especially our beloved sisters! Nike is telling you that the only way to deal with your vital nutrients leaking from your body, and the drastic depletion of your precious life force—is to wear a T-shirt that won't remind you of that fact!! Of course, the more insidious message being conveyed here is that you have at your disposal a magic elixir that would remedy this—you just drink Gatorade!
That's right; simply buy another ‘health’ product from one of our many subsidiary companies, and you'll return all of the vital nutrients that you leaked away and still remain healthy, fresh and dry!
Right? Wrong! Dead wrong!
New cells are reproduced at a faster rate when the body is hyperactive and stressed, which means that because you are losing precious nutrients by sweating, the cells are reproducing themselves from within a depleted mineral and electro-chemical nutrient reservoir. In other words, each time you participate in strenuous exercising you injure and destroy precious cells that your body will have to replace. Cells primarily construct themselves from the solaric and elemental materials present in the air, which are processed through the lungs and condensed to become the mineral components of your bloodstream. If these essential mineral components are "leaking" and "running down your back", or are formed from a toxic or depleted nutrient reservoir caused by the consumption of refined, de‑natured foods or the high concentrations of noxious substances that pollute our air, the cells replaced will be feeble and short-lived!
Minerals function as electrical conductors that relay the vital electrical forces of life efficiently throughout the body-temple. If there is a substantial and continual loss of these conductors through profuse sweating (and water loss), a balanced electrical conduction of vital life force to the brain is compromised, causing the body to have to compensate by leeching minerals from the bones and various other vital organs.
In other words, although it is imperceptible, you are aging to death at a faster rate!
It's logic. If you consistently accelerate the life-processes of the body beyond its natural functioning levels, you speed the structure to damage and decay at a faster rate, for that which you continuously abuse (without sufficient rest and repair), you eventually use up—only at a faster rate!
Exercise—as it is currently promoted by western civilization, is a cytotoxic (cell destroying) activity whose consequences lend credence to an old-world adage which says “… that which is quick to ripe, is quick to rot!” Just take a look at the lifestyles of people who live very healthfully to very advanced ages. The Hunzakuts of the Himalayas who live to an average age of 110 years have no formal, specialized social exercise regimens, just the simple work they do in their lives every day, the fresh rain water they drink and the simple nutritious foods they eat.
Commercial exercise spas for the purpose of health is also a farce, and is the economic ploy of a huge sports industry to lure us into buying the air‑jordans, the flashy jogging sweats, T‑shirts, walking and jogging shoes, the Ben‑Gay rubs, the ace bandages, the health club memberships, and the wide assortment of pharmaceutically sponsored pain-suppression remedies and weight-loss pills.
It is a multi-billion dollar industry.
So. How does bleeding internally, losing vital nutrients by sweating, bone spurs, oxygen debt, cellular destruction, back and knee injuries, sprains, torn cartilages, frayed ligaments (especially around the womb), hyper extensions, capillary damage, hyper‑ventilation and nervous exhaustion add up to health for the exercise-stressed, liberated woman of the new millennium?

Dr. Phil Valentine

VOTE NO TO THE BAILOUT

I thought the unedited comments below from Thurston Bell would be of interest to you.


Well Street is presently seeking Constitutional Protection and absolution for its lawless lifestyle and gambling with the Money of the Nation by Section 4 of Amending Article 14 of the U.S. Constitution.

When this is done, by constitutional amendment, nobody will be able to question the losses and debts of these People because it will all be the Public debt that must be paid.

Holy Private Law Batman! What about everyone else?

America has been riding this lie for far too long, and now the Rich want to avoid paying the Piper.

VOTE NO!

Call your Congressman and Senator, to VOTE NO!

And if they do not vote NO, then you will not be voting for them.

This propblem is rooted deeply into history.

It is exposed and predicted in the Historical recitation of the U.S. Supreme Court in Craig v. Missouri, 29 U.S. 410 (1830), which well explained that any and all emition of paper bonds and bills, of States, Municipalities, Corporations and others, was simply wrongheaded means of depriving the final holder of the paper of the value that they were lead to believe that they were receiving.

Congress ignored this in 1913 by enacting the Federal Reserve Act and allowing the Banks to flood America with cheap credit all through the 1920's...until 1929.

After forcing America to their knees and helpng us fight a War against a National Socialist Germany which was not very distinguishable from the U.S. (See West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, where the Pledge of Aliegence hand salute is described as a Nazi Salute with the hand down-side up) we have seen about 2000% inflation.

We have allowed the creation of even more commercial paper and means of betting for and against paper and events on Wall Street, that it is plainly naked legalized gambling.

Now the elite of Wall Street want their losses made into a debt that is constitutionally guarateed and unquestionable.

Sounds like a Crime to me.

Perhaps we need a reset on the values of everything, and a return to our actual sustainable values.

Thurston Paul Bell

MORAL DISASTER IN THE SCHOOL SYSTEM

Only a day or two after reading the story about the 11 year-old girl sexual predator in England I saw a CNN report that eight middle school children have been expelled from their school in South Carolina for having sex while on a field trip to Washington, DC.

The chaperones made one visit to their quarters in the evening and said there would make a second by 12AM. Since they did not show up for the second visit, five children went out on the prowl looking for sex. They were girls, and they found a room with five boys and had a middle school orgy.

Chalk-up a great victory for the purveyors of sluthood in our education system who have taught children that there is no right or wrong, only choices. They have taught that the authority of parents and church are meaningless, and that “rights” carry no responsibility of self-restraint.

After attending our public education system and having been taught things deviant, given unmonitored access to material that was once rated-R, and exposed to sexually graphic music blaring through the government controlled public airwaves 24/7, on what basis were 8 of the 10 students expelled?

After being fully indoctrinated into the public policy of permissiveness, I am sure that the hypocrisy shown to them by their expulsion makes those children in South Carolina wonder why they are being punished for emulating the leader of our government, or following knowledge given to them by the sexual and media education of the school system.

Education used to be about discipline and cultivating good thinking habits. From what I have seen of my own education which endorsed pornography in the most subtle manner, it is clear that academia has lead our children away from discipline and down a path to sluthood.

Education was supposed to help people properly exercise freedom, which was always about possessing the ability to do the right thing, not just anything. With the elimination of moral absolutes, there is no right thing and there is no wrong thing.

The expulsion of these children from school is inconsistent with all of the messages of permissiveness taught to them. The tacit approval of the debauching of this society by the government and media has taught them that right and wrong are capriciously determined by power and authority, not a formula of goodness and morality.

Their actions were consistent with their education and lack of moral training.

Misfit

THE WAR OF FEMININE PERMISSIVENESS

A change has occurred to the “woman as victim, man a perpetrator” television scenarios that have dominated programming for many years. This season I have been shocked to see programs depicting more men as victims of vindictive and falsely accusing women.

A recent program ran an installment where an accused (male) child is defended by a female defense attorney who argues he is mentally defective because of his exposure to pornography and the overall sexualization of children by this polluted culture of permissive media.

The defense attorney even brought up the girls being dressed as sluts and whores, or are wearing T-shirts that say ‘Hustler’ on them.

Has this fictional story now raised the awareness in the minds of the people (actually the reporting staffs of the media) to the slutification of our girls, and the predatorization (yes, I made up this word, we will need it as we will be seeing more of this) of our boys? .
From the stories from England and South Carolina written about previously, it appears clear that girls can be predators. They are products of modern American education that teach there is no right or wrong, or personal restraint.

Entertainment finally addresses the situation of boys sent to school where girls dress in the slut fashion of the day and wear ‘Hustler’ T-Shirts, and then go home where mom and dad are still at work, and they have unmonitored time to access all things sexual and deviant. The script pointed out that the government controlled airwaves blast “music” of everything sexual and lurid that can be recorded. Yet, there was no address of the tacit endorsement and exposure of pornography in the media shown to children that leeched into the education system of America in the 1980’s. I was there. I saw it.

The media might be recognizing that they have inextricably altered the moral content of Western civilization to the point that there is little shelter for those who would like the choice of virtue and decency in their world.

The programming beamed to young and impressionable minds that can create predators of children who are without discipline, self-restraint, and an understanding of consequences, are carried to us in the marketplace of ideas under the guise of “freedom.”

This is a fallacy and a ruse, for freedom can only be about possessing the right to do the right thing, not just anything.

Doing just anything is permissiveness, which has no moral absolutes, no right thing wrong thing; only choices.

When children are taught in a feminine permissive environment they cannot understand consequences. They cannot practice self-restraint and discipline that they have never been taught. They cannot distinguish good from bad beyond the mere power of the authority defining good and bad and issuing a punishment.

Businesses these days cannot find workers in America, because the work force is undisciplined, lie, cheat, steal, and is generally bawdy in nature—a condition blamed on what educational establishment has produced.

The schools complain that the children are undisciplined, lie, cheat, steal, and do not administer corporal punishment. Teachers cannot enforce discipline because they teach there is no right/good or wrong/bad behavior. Still they complain about lack of discipline.

Parents are in fear for their lives for disciplining their children who have been taught at the school how to call the police and file an abuse complaint if they do not get what they want, or have to endure a parental effort of discipline.

Freedom cannot exist without discipline, self-restraint, and responsibility. The wheels of commerce are grinding to a halt because of lack of disciplined and committed workers, the earnings of the porn industry grow ever larger, and more men are in prison in America than anywhere else.

America has been the victim of the “War of Feminine Permissiveness,” because it abandoned the moral, personal restraint of patriarchy—the natural learning ground of human behavior.

Misfit.

A CASE OF BRITISH OUTRAGE

A case of outrage occurred in England recently, when a 20 year-old man was not found guilty, for his two efforts to rape an 11 year-old girl. For all practical purposes she behaved as a slut in training under the eyes of her parents and the modern permissive educational system of England.

This child misrepresented herself in an adult chat room dating sight where she used language and talked of things that made the judge blush. She elected to meet with the young man in two instances days apart, to which she had cried attempted rape in each case. On the second of the two alleged instances she left her school grounds while on lunch break.

Why aren’t the parents suing the school for not securing the child?

Where were the Parents? Why have they not been investigated for child neglect?

Why is this mixed-up narcissistic deluded product of modern childrearing and liberal anything goes education not in the foster care of the state?

In light of all of the teacher sex cases in this country, we now know that sexual predators are no longer just men.

It seems that the British judiciary understands that girls can be dynamic and dangerous human beings, when left to their own devices. Yet, it seems hesitant to announce that the society of feminine permissiveness it has crafted is to blame for outrageous behavior.

This case raises new questions that I am certain Western civilization will ignore.

What is the age of consent for being a sexual predator?

If women are equal to men, and girls equal to boys, will the women’s interest groups acknowledge that this girl in England is a sexual predator?

When will the courts acknowledge little girls can be sexual predators?

Since this little girl has a brain and nerve endings as other girls, and similar to boys, does this mean that all are potential sexual predators?

If we educate such children about sex, and all things deviant in our public education system, send them home where mom and dad are still at work, (sorry only Mommy is at work because there is no Daddy) and they have unmonitored time to access all things sexual and deviant, do we think that they will not access this information?

In a civilization that preaches endless permissiveness and the lack of right or wrong choice so as to avoid the concept of discipline, can a child ascertain how to do what is right and enjoy the benefit of dong so?

This case has caused outrage in that the young-man was not jailed.

So why is there a clamor in England for the 20 year-old to be imprisoned, since there is state policy to teach that there are no right or wrong choices?

He was the adult, but he is a product of the same educational system, so was he not merely just as irresponsible as the 11 year-old, having received the same training?

England has lead the way, and America will follow.

The disaster here will be on an even larger scale.

by Misfit

THANK YOU MILEY CYRUS

In the hoopla of recent headlines regarding Miley Cyrus, and the video of the discussion on Showbiz Tonight on CNN, the voice of reason has come out of the morass of the featured disjointed commentary.

To my amazement, the featured panelists on Showbiz Tonight presented a rare voice of reason by stating that "the adults failed..." and that 15 year-old Miley could have said "No, not yet..." to the requests of the acclaimed photographer's request to stage the suggestive photograph.

These two women have pegged Miley’s issue and the situation of our nation. Adults not drawing the line have resulted in the sexualization of our children as well as making sex an icon of our society.

It is a crime that there was no man on the program to provide a Fatherly opinion. But we all know that Men are either religious zealots or rapists in the eyes of media and academic culture.

Do these comments of women suggest that the winds are changing since the last Disney starlet received breast implants at the age of 17?

Marketing at the allegedly wholesome Disney Corporation led the prior groomed starlets Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera down paths of indisputable degeneracy. Spears and her horrible choices (tongue kissing Madonna on MTV), and Aguilera and her naked pregnancy poses in and on the cover of a magazine that asks if she is still "Dirty."

Miley's predecessors have answered the question as 'Yes, we are still dirty after we graduated from innocence at Disney to whoredom in the broader world. Just like Madonna went from 'virgin' image immediately to 'slut'. Meanwhile, we in broader society have to live with being inundated by this garbage, even if we do change the channel.

Is there anything wholesome and lovely left of our humanity for our little children to inherit?

Certainly not within the confines of the media that have inundated us with this perverse culture. We have allowed our pre-teen daughters to be sold the message in teen and glamour magazines, that to be grown up is to be a slut.

We are coerced into buying clothing that results in our daughters being dressed as bawdy women in the slut fashion of the day, and at the same time we parents are expected to teach them morals by drawing the line and telling them not to act as they are dressed.

Now more than ever, society has clearly made parents up to be great hypocrites in the eyes of their children, and adults just cannot see it.

Miley's case may give us a voice though. For women have made the point of asking the question, " ...is this an appropriate public photograph for a 15 year-old?", as the question coming from the mouths of women might indicate that like France's turn about against its addiction to nudes and lurid advertisement, our nation may have had enough.

It may now be time that men can ask, 'What message is being sent to 15 year-old boys, who have been the target to the exposed teacher sex rampage in the schools, by the permissive messages of our media?' without being called names and devalued.

We all know the pressure on the young is extreme, even without inducements and messages from the Media and the impulse loosing effects of alcohol and drugs. So then, our message as fathers and Rebuilders of Society is an important balancing act to moderate a society which, if indeed free in any capacity, will always have the loose women and philandering men, but, if it is to survive by the creation of personal affinity between the personalities of individual men and women, will never place the images of sluts on the pedestal and pillar positions as builders and centers of society.

As men, who want good, wholesome, romantic, and feminine women for our own lives, families, and sons, watch this contrived controversy unfold, what will we say to our girls about the unbridled narcissism of our culture, and the naked sexualization of children?

What will we say to our boys who are assaulted with images to make them feel inferior and undeserving?

What will we say to make some effort at having something true, good, and wholesome in our lives, and give to the world in the form of our responsible, self-controlled, accomplished, self-respecting, and mature children?

The media and the women who run the women's and teen girl magazines are not doing the job of preserving and nurturing any true and wholesome core of our society. They are being well paid to do precisely the opposite.

Will you as a Man dare to resist the power? Will you speak up and oppose this War waged against the nature and self-seem of our children?

Misfit

THE ATTACK ON POLYGAMY

I have been considering the ramifications of the Yearn For Zion raid in the law since no 16-year-old girl ever called the State of Texas.

There is little hope that these people's lives will ever be returned to them now that the children have been taken from them.

But, like the Emerson Case, where his life was destroyed, the law of unintended consequences will reveal more truth of what the government seeks.

First of all, the Children are not being returned under guise of their well-being and an investigation of their fathers for bigamy.

If only the Husbands are the criminals, and the State cared about the children, why are they not with their mothers (wink,wink)?

I am certain that the children only need to be swabbed for DNA and then returned to their mothers. It is not like they are going to disappear; the Rangers can keep them on the compound, which is gated.

Or is it that the Mothers are unfit, because they have religious beliefs regarding polygamy that is founded in the Old Testament?

The welfare of the Children is not what it is all about because the State almost always says it is best for the children to be with their mothers—except in this circumstance.

This incident really concerns religious freedom, and the State says that you can believe anything you want, as long as you do not actually practice it.

Second, the bigamy law will now have to be placed on trial and found to be just as unconstitutional as the sodomy laws in Texas were found in Lawrence v. Texas.

This is that open door that the Religious Right claimed that the Lawrence case would bring in polygamy, and actually give hope of the return to Patriarchy instead of Proxy Matriarchy of modern Christianity.

The Rule of Informed and Consenting Adults will now take the Texas Bigamy law down and make America safe for patriarchy again.

Right...

I am certain that it will now be constitutionally challenged up to the U.S. Supreme Court who will refuse to hear the case, which means that:

Two men can be married.

Two Women can be married.

A Man and a Woman can be married, as long as the Man can be held criminally liable for procreating with the woman.

BUT, a Man cannot have more than one Wife, and certainly cannot procreate with them, even if they agree as Informed and Consenting Adults.

SO....WHAT DO WE LEARN FROM THIS?

The U.S. Supreme Court will refuse to hear the case when faced with their own ruling on Lawrence v. Texas. The Federal Courts and Texas Courts will reject the logical precedent of the U.S. Supreme Court and find these men guilty as they prove that they were living in the homes with the Women even over a night or two here and there.

Thus, the line of truth will be clearly shown, that like criminal law, family law is about punishing any family. (in Support of this point I offer this from my recent filing in PA Superior Court):

"The following quote from Dennis Laurence Cuddy, Ph.D., Former Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education. Historian, Political Analyst, and Witness before Congress for the U.S. Department of Justice, reveals what appears to be what is actually in operation in the reasoning of the Courts in cases such as this.

It is an actual state of WAR against the Family structure that is inherent in the Academic, Political, and Judicial Areas of Social Services:

“In the third volume of Arthur Calhoun's A SOCIAL HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN FAMILY, published in 1919 and widely used as a social service textbook, one reads: "The new view is that the higher and more obligatory relation is to society rather than to the family; the family goes back to the age of savagery while the state belongs to the age of civilization.”

(As if Civilization did not spawn from family?)

Nakedly, plainly, those in charge of society are twisted and consumed with their own brilliance and wisdom, which now rules to destroy any ability for any known Society of present or past to function.

Today, the law makes it illegal for Men to Procreate and be poor, while poor Single Women receive all of the benefits of the Socialist Society, and artificially inseminated Lesbians are lauded as forward and liberated thinkers.

It will be nakedly obvious when this is played out. The WAR on Men will no longer be deniable.

Men will tear this Judicial System and Government apart. The People will watch the Foreigner do this, and embrace them as Liberators.

Why does this war exist?

Western Aristocracy is consumed with Ruling by the Sword and de facto Rule by ownership of things.

Western Aristocracy knew that it could not maintain power in the face of prodigious individual families that could out populate, and thus out produce them.

There is probably little coincidence that the Western World continues to represent a smaller and smaller portion of the World Population, as the Polygamous world is growing.

My GOD is not mocked. The meek who understand Patriarchy, the value of Men, and Children, the Nurturing Nature of Women, and the requirement of yielding to natural laws, SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH.